Ayodhya verdict in Supreme Court LIVE Updates: A bench-headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra had reserved the verdict on July Ayodhya verdict updates: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in a majority judgement that the mosque-namaz case need not be referred to. Ayodhya Case: The Supreme Court verdict ended with majority, Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the.
|Published (Last):||3 October 2010|
|PDF File Size:||5.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.41 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Archived from the original on 1 October Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for a Muslim peritioner, argued that the appeal from Allahabad High Court judgment dividing the disputed site into three parts could be heard only after the main issue is vedrict as a preliminary issue. What will the court decide todsy in the Babri Masjid Case? Majority judgement will please majority, minority judgement will please minority.
Although chapter 85 of the Vishnu Smriti lists as many as fifty-two places of pilgrimage, including towns, lakes, rivers, mountains, etc.
The mosque judgemenr attacked with a number of improvised tools, and brought to the ground in a few hours.
Retrieved 11 June Union of India case. Babur accepted the faqirs’ offer and returned to his homeland. Jain, Meenakshi The Battle for Rama: Consequently, Ayodhya’s importance as a pilgrimage centre grew. Supreme Court to wyodhya main Ayodhya case on October 29 week.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing Muslim appellants, had argued that the observation in the Ismail Farooqui judgment has affected the status of mosques in Islam. Supreme Court verdict could impact whether a temple will be built at Ayodhya or not.
A district judge ordered the gates of the mosque to be opened after 37 years see above and allowed Hindus to worship inside the “disputed structure. The then BJP president Lal Krishna Advani took out a cross-country rathyatra to garner support for the move to build a Ram temple at the site. The Gahadavalas were Vaishnavas. Law is not always logical at all. Company Corporate Trends Ayodyya.
Ayodhya dispute – Wikipedia
Land Belongs To Lord Ram: Opposition by Hindu groups. Sequence of events on December 6″. The Liberhan Commission, which was instituted ten days after the demolition of the Babri Mosque insubmitted its report on 30 June — almost 17 years after it began its inquiry.
However, the idols remained inside and priests were allowed entry to perform daily worship. The land was declared to be under dispute, and the gates remained locked. My Saved Articles Sign in Sign up. No reference to larger Bench, Supreme Court holds by 2: Get degree takes on trending news that tell you all about the issue at one place at Economic Times. Observations not essential to religion, says Justice Ashok Bhushan.
Supreme Court Ayodhya verdict: SC refuses to refer Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger bench
However, ayodya local official K. Inthe Supreme Court said that namaz could be offered anywhere and that a mosque was not necessary.
However, it has also said that the ruling would not influence the title case because it was only in context of the acquisition. Retrieved 29 September Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the CJI, said it has to find out the context in which the five-judge had delivered the judgement.
Ayodhya case: Know in four points what today’s ruling means
Choose your reason below and click on the Report button. The Babri Masjid was destroyed during a political rally which turned into a riot on 6 December The ownership of the land was vested in the deity.
Justice Nazir says a constitution bench must decide what constitutes essential practices of a religion and thereafter Ayodhya land dispute should be heard.
The Allahabad High Court pronounces its verdict on four title suits relating to the Ayodhya dispute on 30 September Congress came to power at center after elections inwhile BJP became major opposition party in center and came to power in many states such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.
Lala Sita Ram of Ayodhya, who had access to the older edition inwrote, “The faqirs answered that they would bless him if he promised to build a mosque after demolishing the Janmasthan temple. Views Read Edit View history. The Supreme court will decide whether the Ismail Farooqui vs Union of India judgement be sent to the larger Constitution bench for a reconsideration or not. Muslim groups disputed the findings. He also pointed out that the independent witnesses were all connected, while adding that their opinions were offered without making a proper investigation, research or study into the subject.
Three months after being constituted, the Liberhan Commission began investigations into who and what led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque. The construction of the Ram Temple is one of the key promises made by the Bharatiya Janata Party and the decision today will have a bearing on the bigger decision on the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title suit. Sep 27, 2: Retrieved from ” https: Supreme Court of India stayed the High Court order splitting the disputed site in three parts and said that status quo will remain.
Suits ayyodhya to be decided on the basis of evidence, the bench observed. This will alert our moderators to take action Name Reason for reporting: In the Allahabad High Court verdict, the the land under the dome has gone to the Hindus.